Part 1 – structure of morality
|
├------	Instrumental normativity
|	|
|	├------	The metaphor of the flower in the garden
|	|
|	├------	Origin of normativity
|	|
|	├------	Evolutionary self-selection for normativity
|	|	
|	├------	Pleasure and Eros
|	|
|	├------	Properties of instrumental normativity
|	|
|	├------	Short- and long-term pleasure
|	|
|	├------	Fact/value distinction
|	|
|	├------	Naturalistic fallacy
|	|	
|	├------	Normativity in non-human animals
|	|
|	├------	Map of normativity
|	|
|	├------	Why prefer the self? – the promotion of me, mine, and ours
|	|
|	└------	Fitness and utility
|
├------	Moral normativity
|	|
|	├------	Moral and instrumental oughts
|	|
|	├------	Dual-level psychology of cooperation
|	|
|	├------	Commitment, legitimacy, and responsibility 
|	|
|	├------	Moral obligation
|	|
|	├------	Instrumental and moral bindingness of obligation
|	|
|	└------	The ideal collaborative partner
|
├------	What is morality? 
|	|
|	├------	Altruism and mutualism
|	|
|	├------	Collaborative morality
|	|
|	├------	Morality and humility
|	|
|	├------	Conscience
|	|
|	├------	Where does morality “come from”?  
|	|
|	└------ How morality is derived from collaboration
|		|
|		└------	The genealogy of morality
|
├------	Theory of moral domains
|	|
|	├------	List of evolved moral domains
|	|	|
|	|	├------	1)  Collaborative foraging for mutual benefit
|	|	|
|	|	├------	2)  Patriarchy
|	|	|
|	|	├------	3)  Sexual pair-bonding
|	|	|
|	|	├------	4)  Parenting
|	|	|
|	|	└------	5)  Kin selection
|	|
|	├------	Other (non-evolved) moral domains
|	|	|
|	|	├------	Organised religion
|	|	|
|	|	├------	Medical ethics
|	|	|
|	|	└------	Financial industry regulatory body
|	|
|	├------	Features of moral domains
|	|
|	├------	List of features
|	|
|	├------	Duty  
|	|
|	├------	Ethical responsibility and obligation
|	|
|	├------	Moral principle
|	|
|	├------	Why are norms normative?  The cooperativisation of normativity  
|	|
|	├------	The goals-methods model of moral domains
|	|	|
|	|	└------ Internal goals-methods structure of moral domains
|	|
|	├------	This model unifies existing ethical systems
|	|
|	├------	Rightness of action and rightness of goal
|	|
|	├------	The difference between morality and ethics
|	|
|	├------	The Pirate Code of Conduct 
|	|
|	├------	Just war theory and the independence thesis
|	|
|	├------	Mutual benefit in moral domains
|	|
|	├------	Relativism and universalism
|	|
|	├------	Evolutionary ethics and moral realism 
|	|
|	├------	Provoking moral domains: the metaphor of the radar screen
|	|
|	├------	Is morality rational?
|	|
|	├------	Virtue and the goals-methods theory of moral domains
|	|
|	├------	Intention
|	|
|	├------	Moral purity and sacredness
|	|
|	├------	The link between physical and moral disgust
|	|
|	├------	Trading the sacred for the profane
|	|
|	├------	Purity in the Hindu religion
|	|
|	├------	“Harmless harms” and the Theory of Dyadic Morality
|	|
|	├------	Moral dumbfounding
|	|
|	├------	Origins of Christian prohibition of homosexuality and extra-marital sex
|	|
|	├------	Why is harm the default explanation of immorality?  
|	|
|	├------	Moral anger
|	|
|	└------	Other structural analyses of morality
|
├------	Features of collaboration 
|	|
|	├------	Joint goal 
|	|
|	├------	Role ideals
|	|
|	├------	Joint agent “we”
|	|
|	├------	Joint commitment to collaborate
|	|
|	├------	Mutual respect and deservingness
|	|
|	├------	Partner choice
|	|
|	├------	Cooperative identity and reputation
|	|
|	├------	Moral injury
|	|
|	├------	Collective moral identity
|	|
|	├------	Partner control
|	|
|	├------	Respectful protest
|	|
|	└------	Duty and responsibility
|
├------	Regulation in large groups
|	|
|	├------	Interdependence and group loyalty
|	|
|	├------	Coordination in large groups
|	|
|	├------	Conventions, moral norms, and social norms
|	|	|
|	|	├------ Conventional and moral norms
|	|	|
|	|	├------	Social norms
|	|	|
|	|	└------	Conventions, similarity, and mutual trust
|	|	
|	├------	Objective right and wrong
|	|	
|	├------	Objective justice
|	|	
|	├------	Religion 
|	|
|	├------	Cultural rationality and identity
|	|
|	├------	Commitment to, and legitimacy of, the social contract
|	|
|	├------	Monitoring, evaluation, self-governance, and moral identity
|	|
|	├------	Guilt and blame
|	|
|	└------	Origin of the social contract
|
├------	Competition and dominance
|	|
|	├------	Authority ranking
|	|
|	├------	Liberty, autonomy, and egalitarianism
|	|
|	├------	Modern egalitarian societies
|	|
|	├------	U-shaped history of human hierarchy? 
|	|
|	├------	Self-domestication of the human race
|	|
|	├------	Transition from egalitarianism to inequality
|	|
|	├------	Young children are instinctively prepared for social situations of hierarchy and dominance
|	|
|	└------	Prehistory of warfare
|
├------	The Moral Compass
|
└------	The Stakeholder Principle 
	|
	├------	Interdependence and moral domains
	|
	├------	Hamilton’s Rule
	|
	├------	Interdependence through human history
	|
	├------	Ultimate and proximate motivations for helping
	|
	└------	Interdependence and morality

Part 2 – moral values
|
├------	Perfect Compassion
|	|
|	├------	Dark traits
|	|
|	├------	Basis of morality
|	|
|	├------	Currency of morality
|	|
|	├------	Charity and deservingness
|	|
|	├------	Rightness and moral authority
|	|
|	├------	Doing one’s best
|	|
|	├------	Partial (subjective) and impartial (objective) moral reasoning
|	|
|	├------	Contingent morality and ethics
|	|
|	└------	Distribution of benefit and harm from the perspective of the ego
|
├------	Fairness
|	|
|	├------	Types of sharing
|	|
|	├------	Two-step evolution of fairness
|	|
|	├------	Distributive justice and collaboration
|	|
|	├------	Fairness as a moral (sub)domain
|	|
|	├------	Evolution of sharing
|	|
|	├------	Sharing in response to need
|	|
|	├------	Sharing proportionately  
|	|
|	├------	Inequity aversion
|	|
|	├------	Self-other equivalence
|	|
|	├------	Fairness to others
|	|
|	├------	Resentment and indignation
|	|	
|	├------	Free riders
|	|
|	├------	Types of justice
|	|
|	├------	Justice and judgement
|	|
|	├------	John Rawls and the veil of ignorance
|	|
|	└------	Experimental results
|
├------	Reciprocity
|	|
|	├------	Types of reciprocity
|	|	|
|	|	├------	1)  tit-for-tat reciprocity
|	|	|	|
|	|	|	├------	Contingent cooperation
|	|	|	|
|	|	|	├------	Forgiveness
|	|	|	|
|	|	|	├------	Tit-for-tat reciprocity and game theory
|	|	|	|
|	|	|	├------	Punishment
|	|	|	|
|	|	|	└------	Islands of cooperation
|	|	|
|	|	├------	2)  indirect reciprocity
|	|	|
|	|	├------	3)  downstream reciprocity
|	|	|
|	|	├------	4)  attitudinal reciprocity
|	|	|	
|	|	├------	5)  long-term “buddy” reciprocity
|	|	|
|	|	└------	6)  generalised reciprocity
|	|
|	├------	What makes reciprocity tick
|	|
|	├------	Reciprocity is a survival skill in hunter-gatherer societies
|	|
|	└------	References for this chapter
|
├------	Targeted helping
|	|		
|	├------	Sympathetic distress within the brain leads to a wish to help
|	|	
|	├------	Empathic concern and taking action
|	|		
|	├------	Empathic distress and compassion
|	|	
|	├------	Helping in social groups
|	|
|	└------	Generalised care
|
├------	Empathy
|	|
|	├------	Cognitive empathy
|	|
|	├------	Emotional resonance
|	|	|
|	|	├------	1)  body mimicry and neural mimicry
|	|	|
|	|	├------	2)  emotional contagion; mirroring
|	|	|	
|	|	├------	3)  vicarious arousal and alarm
|	|	|
|	|	└------	4)  sympathy
|	|
|	├------	Empathic concern and helping behaviour
|	|
|	├------	Perspective taking and helping behaviour  
|	|
|	├------	Perspective taking and cooperation
|	|
|	├------	Perspective taking and exploitation
|	|
|	└------	Additional references
|
├------	The Golden Rule
|	|
|	├------	“Imagine self in position of other” perspective taking
|	|
|	└------	“Imagine other” perspective taking
|
├------	Loyalty and unconditional love
|	|
|	├------	Spectrum of conditional benefit and harm
|	|
|	├------	Loyalty and the Stakeholder Principle
|	|	
|	├------	Loyalty to an ideology
|	|
|	└------	Trait unconditional empathic concern
|
├------	Respecting ownership
|	|
|	├------	Possession and ownership
|	|
|	├------	Existing analyses 
|	|
|	├------	History of human possession and ownership
|	|
|	├------	Social norms and ownership
|	|
|	├------	The social contract and ownership 
|	|
|	└------	Legitimacy of ownership
|
├------	Integrity
|
├------	Good manners
|	|
|	└------	The Montagu Principle
|
├------	Self-discipline
|	|
|	├------	Self-control and duty
|	|
|	└------	Self control and meditation
|
├------	Cooperative breeding
|	|
|	├------	Enhanced prosocial perspective taking in humans
|	|
|	├------	Existing cognitive skills of great apes
|	|
|	├------	Competitive social life of other great apes
|	|
|	├------	Cooperation in humans: thinking and acting together
|	|
|	├------	Sharing and tolerance
|	|
|	├------	Hypothesis for the evolutionary history of cooperative breeding
|	|
|	└------	References for this chapter
|
├------	Patriarchy 
|	|
|	├------	System of social norms
|	|		
|	├------	Patriarchy is more powerful in humans than other species
|	|
|	├------	U-shaped history of human patriarchy
|	|
|	├------	Female resistance to patriarchy in primates
|	|
|	├------	Does patriarchy have a biological origin?
|	|
|	├------	Patriarchy in the domestic and public spheres
|	|
|	├------	Patriarchy is not inevitable
|	|
|	├------	Patriarchy and narcissism
|	|
|	├------	Toxic masculinity
|	|
|	├------	Toxic feminism
|	|
|	├------	The moralisation of women’s bodily autonomy
|	|
|	├------	Benevolent / hostile sexism and the Madonna / whore dichotomy
|	|
|	├------	How patriarchy harms men’s relationships with women
|	|
|	└------	The reasonable man and the reasonable woman
|
├------	Personhood
|	|
|	├------	Kant’s “ends and means”: treating every human with dignity and respect
|	|
|	├------	Human rights 
|	|
|	├------	Circles of concern
|	|
|	├------	Meg De Amasi: interview by her daughter Ena Miller
|	|		
|	└------	Fundamental attribution error
|
└------	Dark and light traits
	|
	├------	D, the dark factor of personality
	|
	├------	D and Perfect Compassion
	|
	├------	Multi-dimensional nature of D
	|
	├------	Dark traits
	|
	├------	Traits high in D 
	|	|
	|	├------	Anti-social personality disorder
	|	|
	|	├------	Controlling behaviour
	|	|
	|	├------	Egotism
	|	|
	|	├------	Enduring personality change after a catastrophic experience
	|	|
	|	├------	Entitlement (psychological)
	|	|
	|	├------	Grandiosity
	|	|
	|	├------	Machiavellianism
	|	|
	|	├------	Moral disengagement
	|	|
	|	├------	Narcissism
	|	|
	|	├------	Passive aggression
	|	|
	|	├------	Psychopathy
	|	|
	|	├------	Sadism
	|	|
	|	├------	Self-interest
	|	|
	|	├------	Spite
	|	|
	|	└------	Toxicity (social)
	|
	├------	Confusion between antisocial and narcissistic personality disorders and psychopathy
	|	|
	|	└------	Overlap between NPD / ASPD traits and psychopathic traits
	|
	├------	D and political extremism  
	|
	├------	Light traits
	|
	├------	The light triad
	|
	├------	A quiet ego
	|
	└------	Online surveys

Part 3 – psychology and spirituality
|
├------	Emotions
|	|
|	├------	The Smoke Detector Principle
|	|
|	├------	Naming emotions for conscious processing
|	|
|	└------	Equanimity
|
├------	The ego
|	|
|	├------	Monitoring and the “default state”
|	|
|	├------	“Your Restless Mind”  
|	|
|	├------	Meditation
|	|	|
|	|	├------	Taming the wild buffalo
|	|	|
|	|	├------	Clear sight and self-honesty
|	|	|
|	|	└------	Acceptance and moral action
|	|
|	└------	“Be Soft”
|
├------	Ego defences
|	|
|	├------	Puppet strings and the Grey Rock 
|	|
|	├------	Classical ego defences
|	|		
|	├------	Mature ego defenses 
|	|
|	└------	References
|
└------	Desire and “original sin”
	|
	├------	Short term and long term benefits
	|
	├------	Seeking to thrive through crime or unethical means  
	|
	├------	Maladaptive, unconscious, immature ego defences
	|
	├------	The effect on others
	|
	├------	Relying on sensual pleasure to make us happy
	|
	├------	Attachments  
	|
	├------	Striving
	|
	└------	Clinging to experience  

Bibliography